Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Isaiah 40:22 DOES GOD NEED A CHAMPION


 
 
DOES GOD NEED A CHAMPION
 
IN AUSCHWITZ
THEY PUT GOD ON TRIAL
FOR BEING SILENT
 
THEY FOUND HIM
 
GUILTY
 
I WAS AGHAST
FEARED LIGHTNING
 
BUT THEN LIGHTNING
WOULD BE A PLEASANT INTERLUDE
FROM
GASSING AND STARVATION
 
MAYBE IT WAS THE HUNGER
 
BUT I HEARD A VOICE
 
I DON’T NEED A CHAMPION
 
I HAVE GIVEN YOU THE WORLD
TO DO WITH AS YOU WILL
 
KEEP THE LAWN MOWED
OR
LET THE WEEDS GROW
 
 
I DO NOT PERMIT EVIL
 
EVIL
IS THE ABSENCE OF ME
 
DO NOT BLAME ME
FOR THE WEEDS
YOU HAVE LET GROW
 
IF I CAME AGAIN
YOU’D KILL ME AGAIN
 
IT IS TIME
TO TEND YOUR GARDEN
 
FRANK A VOLLMER

Friday, January 24, 2014

(Romans 2:15) CAT

 
 
CAT

 

WE HAVE A CAT

WHO CAME TO US

AS A STRAY KITTEN

AT CHRISTMAS TIME

 

PROBABLY

A YULE TIME PRESENT ESCAPEE

OUT THE DOOR AND LOST

 

WE TRIED TO FIND THE OWNER

NO RESULT

WE CALLED THE SHELTER

 

THEY SAID THEY HAD SO MANY CATS

THEY WERE EUTHANIZING THE SURPLUS

 

BY THAT TIME

SHE HAD WORMED HER WAY

INTO OUR HEART

AND STAYED

 

I MARVELED

THAT SO YOUNG A CAT

WITH NO MOTHER

WOULD DO CAT THINGS

 

LIKE DOING OBEISANCE

TO THE OLDER CAT

WAITING UNTIL IT WAS FED

BEFORE EATING

 

TEASING THE DOG

 BY BATTING HIM

THEN RUNNING AWAY

 

CHASING FLIES

CATNIP MICE

TELLING OUTDOOR CATS

THIS WAS HER DOMAIN

 

I KNOW IT WAS INSTINCT

BUT STILL IT WAS MARVELOUS

TO SEE

 

 

THE CHURCH IN ROMANS

SAYS


 



(WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES

IS WRITTEN ON THEIR HEARTS,

 WHILE THEIR CONSCIENCE

ALSO BEARS WITNESS

AND THEIR CONFLICTING THOUGHTS

ACCUSE OR PERHAPS EXCUSE THEM)


 

WHAT THE CAT DOES INSTINCTIVELY

MAN MUST DO BY DECISION

 

TO DO IT LIKE THE CAT

WOULD TO BE LIKE A ROBOT

 

TO BURY YOURSELF IN JESUS

IS NOT TO BE AN AUTOMATON

BUT TO ACT AND DO

WHAT WE KNOW IS RIGHT

 

TO DO OTHERWISE

IS TO DENY HIS INDWELLING

 

WHAT IS WRITTEN ON OUR HEARTS

 

I TRIED VERY HARD

TO NOT GET TOO FOND OF HER

 

BUT

THERE IS SOMEONE KNOCKING

AT THE DOOR

 

I DON'T WANT TO GET UP

SHE’S ASLEEP IN MY LAP

 

 

FRANK A VOLLMER

Monday, January 20, 2014

(MATTHEW 5:23-24) WHEN YOU COME TO THE ALTAR

 
 
 
 
WHEN YOU COME TO THE ALTAR

HOW MANY TIMES
HAVE WE COME TO THE ALTAR
AND NOT CALLED TO MIND
THE ADMONITION
IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING
AGAINST YOUR BROTHER OR SISTER
GO FIRST TO THEM
AND SETTLE IT
THEN COME TO ME
YOU HAVE ASKED FORGIVENESS
BUT WOULD NOT GRANT IT
WOULD YOU LIKE
YOU
AS YOUR GOD
NOT ME
WOULD YOU DO BETTER
WOULD ANYONE SERVE YOU
WILLINGLY
YOU COME TO THE ALTAR
WITHOUT THOUGHT
AND THE BREAD
TASTES DRY
ON YOUR TONGUE
BUT COME WITH A FORGIVING HEART
THE LORD WILL FILL YOUR HEART WITH SWEETNESS
 
 
FRANK A VOLLMER


Monday, January 6, 2014

SUNDAY SCHOOL LESSON

 
 
SUNDAY SCHOOL LESSON
 
WE LEARNED TWO WORDS
IN SUNDAY SCHOOL
TODAY
 
CATAPHATIC
 
WHICH LITERALLY MEAN
CATA = DESCEND
FEMI = TO SPEAK
 
IN LAYMEN’S LANGUAGE IT MEANS
TO BRING GOD DOWN
 IN SUCH A WAY
SO AS TO SPEAK OF HIM
 
AND
APOPHATIC
 
.WHICH LITERALLY MEANS
APO = NOT
FEMI = TO SPEAK      
IN LAYMEN’S LANGUAGE IT MEANS
. TO SAY NO
 
THESE POSITIONS WERE FIRST PUT FORWARD
BY
PSEUDO-DIONYSIUS THE AREOPAGITE
 
WHO LIVED ABOUT 550 AD
IN HIS BOOK
ON THE DIVINE NAMES
 
CHURCHES WHICH ARE CLEAR
OF ANY RITUAL OR SYMBOLS
ARE CLOSE TO THE CATAPHATIC OUTLOOK
WHILE CHURCHES WHICH LEAN
TOWARD SYMBOLS OR RITUALS
ARE MORE APOPHATIC
 
BECAUSE SO MANY CHURCHES
HAVE AMALGAMATED THEIR BELIEFS
THERE OFTEN IS NO CLEAR DISTINCTION
AS TO WHICH SCHOOL THEY FOLLOW
 
SOME SPIRITUAL TEACHERS
ADVISE
TO FOLLOW A MIDDLE PATH
BETWEEN THESE TWO CONCEPTS
 
LIKE ODYSSEUS
BETWEEN CHARYBDIS AND SCYLLA
 
OTHERS
INCLUDING THE EASTERN CHURCH
THERE  SHOULD BE A DIAGONAL PATH
BETWEEN THE TWO CONCEPTS
 
STARTING FROM THE CONCRETE
TO THE INEFFABLE
 
WHICH POINT I AM TRYING TO REACH
 
AS I HAVE SAID
IN MY POEM

 
SURFBIRD
.
 
THE SEA CAME IN THE LITTLE BIRD RAN
AND FOLLOWED THE SEA BACK OUT
THEN RAN FROM THE SEA AND FOLLOWED IT OUT
DANCING THE DAY IN TIME TO THE SEA
PLAYING FOR FOOD
 
I WONDER IF IT FEARS THE SEA
LIKE I DO GOD
PLAYING THE EDGES OF HIS LOVE
OR MY LOVE REALLY AS IT EBBS AND FLOWS
RUNNING WHEN THE WAVE COMES STRONG
SEABIRDS ON DELICATE FEET
RUNNING FROM THE WATER
 
SOMEDAY HOPEFULLY UNAWARE
THE SEA WILL OVERWHELM ME
SWEEPING ME OUT TO THE DEPTHS OF THE SEA
TO BE ONE WITH THE MOTION THE SURGE OF THE SEA
TO BE THE SEA
 
TO PLAY WITH THE BIRDS AT THE WATER'S EDGE
TO FEED THEM
AND CALL THEM TO THE DANCE
 
 
FRANK A VOLLMER
 
 
 
                              
 
 
Cataphatic (sometimes spelled kataphatic) theology is the expressing of God or the divine through positive terminology. This is in contrast to defining God or the divine in what God is not, which is referred to as negative or apophatic theology. The word cataphatic itself is formed from two Greek words, "cata" meaning to descend and "femi" meaning to speak. Thus, to combine them translates the word roughly as "to bring God down in such a way so as to speak of him
 
Apophatic theology (from Ancient Greek: ἀπόφασις, from ἀπόφημι – apophēmi, "to deny")—also known as negative theology, via negativa or via negationis[1] (Latin for "negative way" or "by way of denial")—is a theology that attempts to describe God, the Divine Good, by negation, to speak only in terms of what may not be said about the perfect goodness that is God.[2] It stands in contrast with cataphatic theology.
A startling example can be found with theologian John Scotus Erigena (9th century): "We do not know what God is. God Himself does not know what He is because He is not anything. Literally God is not, because He transcends being."